13.
342
I .redaorg mead reven bat aegbut ow? tot véleansen and daft owt tant dost ar? to welv al tadt babba avar Tarawod binode wildazablod gnol yntral pantnoo stew (esmuoð matbral add to mertua erið oð qu ylatstreo dat bna bøvelser ed blnow erumret? tant tud tanbul boldT s not ydłezeoen on ed bluow eradd ‚DIRI 20 to ade979dnt ade nt tastheyze aɗ Zon blvow di amit tærið 19776 toritzat deum I „tnemtalogga nova tetab of Tagnol yna atfdıq adt ent to erad en Lalofttom saoɗd to adtamer sdt zand duo šaloq aban don eToW WABEBɔanru eqbul b*INT a odzvodź odw Itonwo] -919ji? 97Aw dedT .Iinto” eft eroled blsi need bai ereqsi tadi .Aɛso add to atost ads to aanezsing al don shot-
.0
•Inox£ way Jasuper of tortod and even I
to ViaðstDaß erið of rectal atɗs to “gos a tiremenð oð yonal-
C
" (.b2)
(*ote **nd I
***oggl¶ .?
.eoldenī taido
COPY
Dear Sir Francis Piggott,
Government House,
Hongkong, 13th.November, '08
In your official letter of November
6th you say that I have expressed an almost invincible aversion to a conversation with yourself,at which in a friendly and in- formal mayner you might have been able to put me in possession of facts which would convince me that a better understanding was nedessary and could easily be arrived at.
I have no aversion to such a conversa- tion, and I should indeed be most happy if it brought about the
results you anticipate. My view has been that where there
was some definite controversial point it was better to have it in writing, so that I could inform myself as to mtecedent con- ditions and precedents, or correspondence.
Many such points have formed the sub- ject of what has become in the aggregata a very voluminous cor- respondence. If you would desire to have the conversation
you refer to I will endeavour to arrange an early date.
Yours very truly,
(Sd) P.D.LUGARD.
* . .058
(.0.X.0.X (braqut doirober 18
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.